ABSTRACT
Background: Prior studies indicated a decrease in the incidences of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) during the early stages of the COVID- 19 pandemic. We evaluated differences in the incidence, severity of SAH presentation, and ruptured aneurysm treatment modality during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including 49 countries and 187 centers. We recorded volumes for: COVID-19 hospitalizations, SAH hospitalizations, Hunt-Hess Grade, coiling, clipping, and aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) in-hospital mortality. Diagnoses were identified by ICD-10 codes or stroke databases from January 2019 to May 2021. Results: Over the study period, there were 16,247 aSAH admissions, 344,491 COVID-19 admissions, 8,300 coiling and 4,240 aneurysmal clipping procedures. Declines were observed in aSAH admissions (-6.4% [95%CI -7,-5.8];p=0.0001) during the first year of the pandemic compared to the prior year, most pronounced in high-volume SAH and highvolume COVID-19 hospitals. There was a trend towards a decline in mild and moderate presentation of aSAH (mild: -5%[-5.9,-4.3], p=0.06;moderate: -8.3%[-10.2,-6.7], p=0.06) but no difference in higher SAH severity. The clipping rate remained unchanged (30.7% vs. 31.2%, p=0.58), whereas coiling increased (53.97%vs.56.5%, p=0.009). There was no difference in aSAH in-hospital mortality rate (19.1% vs 20.1%,p=0.12). Conclusion: During the first year of the pandemic, there was a decrease in aSAH admissions volume driven by a decrease in mild to moderate presentation of aSAH. There was an increase in the coiling rate, but no change in clipping rate, nor change in aSAH in-hospital mortality.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: During the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, many centers globally reported a significant decrease in volumes of emergencies including acute stroke (AS) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While the reason for this remains unknown, pandemic-driven anxiety among patients may have resulted in unwarranted refusals to transport when deemed necessary by EMS (Emergency Medical Services) providers. We sought to study the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the patterns of Emergency Medical transport (EMTr) and patient refusals to transport when serious medical conditions were suspected by EMS personnel. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study of Grady Health System's EMS, we compared the rates of EMTr and refusals for adult patients with suspected diagnoses of AS, AMI, and other medical conditions in the first year of the pandemic (Y1, Mar 2020-Feb 2021) with the corresponding period in the year prior (Y0). We also compared the temporal trends for these variables across the different pandemic waves (1st , Mar-May 2020;2nd , Jun-Aug 2020;3rd, Sep 2020-Feb 2021) with the corresponding periods in the year before. Results: Grady EMS responded to 207,888 calls in Y1 compared to 201,968 in Y0. The overall rate of refusals for all diagnoses was 15.5% in Y1 vs 14.1% in Y0, that for AS was 2.25% in Y1 vs 1.77% in Y0 and 7.5% in Y1 vs 5.67% in Y0 for AMI (Figure). Conclusion: There were more refusals in the first two waves of the pandemic. While refusals were higher for AS and AMI, this was not statistically significant. Our study provides valuable insight into the behavioral patterns of patients seeking emergency care during the pandemic and emphasizes a need for public education and more research. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Intraluminal carotid thrombi (ILT) are uncommon and present in only 0.4 to 1.5 % of patients with stroke. The endothelial inflammation and hypercoagulable state associated with COVID-19 (caused by SARS-CoV-2) poses a risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Herein, we present a series of stroke patients with ILT in the setting of a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods and Results: From July 9 , 2020 to August 17 , 2020, four patients were identified with acute ischemic stroke with varying thrombus burden but similar morphological patterns of ILT. All patients had evidence of recent SARS-CoV-2 infection as confirmed by PCR (n=3) or IgG antibody (n=1) in addition to clinical and radiological manifestations consistent with COVID-19. General characteristics and imaging of the patients are shown in table 1. Mean age was 55.3 ±7.7 years. Most patients (3) had at least two vascular risk factors and none had a central embolic source other than ILT. D-Dimer was profoundly elevated in 3 patients. ILT involved the cervical (3) and intracranial (1) internal carotid artery. COVID-19 symptoms ranged from mild transient respiratory symptoms to severe pneumonia requiring critical care support. None of the patients received acute reperfusion therapy either due to presentation beyond the therapeutic window or due to the absence of large vessel occlusion and/or unfavorable imaging profile. Conclusion: In this small case series of relatively young patients with acute ischemic stroke we found an association between COVID-19 infection and ILT. This suggests a distinctive pathophysiological pattern of stroke in COVID-19 patients. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the underlying pathophysiology and target specific treatment modalities. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background and purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a small but clinically significant risk of stroke, the cause of which is frequently cryptogenic. In a large multinational cohort of consecutive COVID-19 patients with stroke, we evaluated clinical predictors of cryptogenic stroke, short-term functional outcomes and in-hospital mortality among patients according to stroke etiology. Methods: We explored clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of consecutively evaluated patients 18 years of age or older with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and laboratory-confirmed COVID- 19 from 31 hospitals in 4 countries (3/1/20-6/16/20). Results: Of the 14.483 laboratory-confirmed patients with COVID-19, 156 (1.1%) were diagnosed with AIS. Sixty-one (39.4%) were female, 84 (67.2%) white, and 88 (61.5%) were between 60-79 years of age. The most frequently reported etiology of AIS was cryptogenic (55/129, 42.6%), which was associated with significantly higher white blood cell count, c-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels than non-cryptogenic AIS patients (p</=0.05 for all comparisons). In a multivariable backward stepwise regression model estimating the odds of in-hospital mortality, cryptogenic stroke mechanism was associated with a fivefold greater odds in-hospital mortality than strokes due to any other mechanism (adjusted OR 5.16, 95%CI 1.41-18.87, p=0.01). In that model, older age (aOR2.05 per decade, 95%CI 1.35-3.11, p<0.01) and higher baseline NIHSS (aOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.02-1.21, p=0.01) were also independently predictive of mortality. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that cryptogenic stroke among COVID-19 patients may berelated to more severe disease and carries a significant risk of early mortality.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: To evaluate overall ischemic stroke rates, specific subtypes, and clinical presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic in a multicenter observational study from eight states across US. Methods: We compared all ischemic strokes admitted between January 2019 and May 2020, grouped as;March-May 2020 (COVID-19 period), March-May 2019 (seasonal pre-COVID period) and November 2019-January 2020 (immediate pre-COVID-19 period). Primary outcome was stroke severity at admission measured by NIHSS stratified as mild (0-7), moderate (8-14), and severe (>14) symptoms. Secondary outcomes were number of large vessel occlusions (LVOs), stroke etiology, IV-tPA rates, and disposition. Results: Of the 7,969 patients diagnosed with acute stroke during the study period, 933 (12%) presented in the COVID-19 period, 1319 (17%), and 1254 (16%) presented in the seasonal pre- COVID-19 and immediate pre-COVID-19 periods, respectively. Significant decline was observed in the weekly mean volume of newly diagnosed strokes (98±7.3 vs 50±20, p<0.01 and 95±10.5 vs 50±20, p<0.01), LVOs (16.5±3.8 vs 8.3±5.9, p<0.01 and 14.3± 4.5 vs 8.3±5.9, p<0.01), and IV-tPA (5.3±2.9 vs 10.9±3.4 and 12.7±4.1, p<0.01). Mean weekly proportion of LVOs remained the same, when compared with seasonal pre-COVID-19 period (18%±5 vs 16%±7, p=0.24) and immediate pre-COVID-19 period (17.4%±4 vs. 16%±7, p=0.32). Additionally, these patients presented with less severe disease (NIHSS<14;aOR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.41-0.97, p=0.035) during the COVID-19 period ascompared to immediate pre-COVID-19 period. Conclusions: We observed a decrease in newly diagnosed stroke cases and rates of IV-tPAadministration, while the LVO frequency remained unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic.Additionally, these stroke patients had more severe presentations.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been associated with a significant risk of thrombotic events in critically ill patients. Aims: To summarize the findings of a multinational observational cohort of patients with SARS-CoV- 2 and cerebrovascular disease. Methods: Retrospective observational cohort of consecutive adults evaluated in the emergency department and/or admitted with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across 31 hospitals in 4 countries (2/1/2020 - 06/16/2020). The primary outcome was the incidence rate of cerebrovascular events, inclusive of acute ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhages (ICH), and cortical vein and/or sinus thrombosis (CVST). Results: Of the 14,483 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, 172 were diagnosed with an acute cerebrovascular event (1.13% of cohort;1130/100,000 patients, 95%CI 970- 1320/100,000), 68/171 (40.5%) of whom were female and 96/172 (55.8%) were between the ages 60-79 years. Of these, 156 had acute ischemic stroke (1.08%;1080/100,000 95%CI 920- 1260/100,000), 28 ICH (0.19%;190/100,000 95%CI 130 - 280/100,000) and 3 with CVST (0.02%;20/100,000, 95%CI 4-60/100,000). The in-hospital mortality rate for SARS-CoV-2-associated stroke was 38.1% and for ICH 58.3%. After adjusting for clustering by site and age, baseline strokeseverity, and all predictors of in-hospital mortality found in univariate regression (p<0.1: male sex,tobacco use, arrival by emergency medical services, lower platelet and lymphocyte counts, andintracranial occlusion), cryptogenic stroke mechanism (aOR 5.01, 95%CI 1.63-15.44, p<0.01), olderage (aOR 1.78, 95%CI 1.07-2.94, p=0.03), and lower lymphocyte count on admission (aOR 0.58,95%CI 0.34-0.98 p=0.04) were the only independent predictors of mortality among patients withstroke and COVID-19. Conclusions: COVID-19 is associated with a small but significant risk of clinically relevantcerebrovascular events, particularly ischemic stroke. The mortality rate is high for COVID-19associated cerebrovascular complications, therefore aggressive monitoring and early interventionshould be pursued to mitigate poor outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, decreased volumes of stroke admissions and mechanical thrombectomy were reported. The objective was to examine whether subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH) hospitalizations and ruptured aneurysm coiling interventions demonstrated similar declines. Methods: We conducted a global, retrospective, observational study across 6 continents, 37 countries, and 140 comprehensive stroke centers. Patients with diagnosis of SAH, ruptured aneurysm coiling interventions, COVID-19 were identified using ICD-10 codes or by prospectively maintained stroke databases. The 3-month cumulative volume, monthly volumes for SAH hospitalizations and ruptured aneurysm coiling procedures were compared for the period before (1- year and immediately before) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1 to May 31, 2020). Results: There was a significant decline in SAH hospitalizations with 2,044 admissions in the 3 months immediately before and 1,585 admissions during the pandemic, representing a decline of 22.5% (95%CI, -24.3 to -20.7, p<0.0001). Embolization of ruptured aneurysms declined with 1,170 to 1,035 procedures, respectively, representing an 11.5%(95%CI, -13.5 to -9.8, p=0.002) drop. Hospitals with higher COVID-19 hospitalization burden demonstrated greater declines in SAH and ruptured aneurysm coiling compared to lower COVID-19 burden. A relative increase in coiling of ruptured aneurysms was noted in low coiling volume hospitals of 41.1% (95%CI, 32.3-50.6, p=0.008) despite a decrease in SAH admissions in this tertile. Conclusions: There was a global decrease in subarachnoid hemorrhage admissions and ruptured aneurysm embolizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among low-volume coiling SAH hospitals, there was an increase in the ruptured aneurysm coiling intervention. These findings in SAH are consistent with a global decrease in other emergencies such as stroke and myocardial infarction.
ABSTRACT
Background: We sought to evaluate whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have contributed to delays in acute stroke management at Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs). Methods: Pooled clinical data of consecutive adult stroke patients from 12 U.S. CSCs (1/1/2019- 5/31/2020) were queried. The rate of thrombolysis for non-transferred patients within the Target: Stroke goal of 60min was compared between patients admitted 3/1/2019-5/31/2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 3/1/2020-5/31/2020 (COVID-19). The time from arrival to imaging and treatment with thrombolysis or thrombectomy, as continuous variables, were also assessed. Results: Of the 7906 patients included, 1319 were admitted pre-COVID-19 and 933 were admitted during COVID-19, 15% of whom underwent intravenous thrombolysis. There was no difference in the rate of thrombolysis within 60min during COVID-19 (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.42-1.86, p=0.74), despite adjustment for variables associated with earlier treatment (adjusted OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.38-1.76, p=0.61). There was no significant overall delay to thrombolysis during the COVID-19 period vs. pe- COVID-19 (p=0.42), even after multivariable adjustment (p=0.63) or after comparison across months leading to COVID-19 (Figure). The only independent predictor of delayed treatment time between periods was the use of emergency medical services (adjusted β=-6.93, 95%CI -12.83 -1.04, p=0.03). There was no significant delay from hospital arrival to imaging in all patients, or imaging to skin puncture in patients who underwent thrombectomy. Conclusions: There was no independent effect of the COVID-19 period on delays in acute care with respect to thrombolysis or thrombectomy in this multicenter observational cohort. Further studies are warranted to externally validate these findings, and determine if site volume or center accreditation may mediate a collateral effect of the pandemic on stroke care paradigms.